· Aazam, Z. (2005). The social logic of the mosque: A building and urban spatial investigation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium. Cardiff University, UK.
· Adnan, N. A., Shahminan, R. N. R., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Golden ratio assessments of aesthetic value and proportion on existing Minbar at the state Mosques in Johore. Environment, 134‑144.
· Al‑Zaman, M. S. (2020). Religious communication in digital public sphere. Journal Panellation, 29‑42.
· Argyle, M. (2013). Bodily communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
· Bier, C. (2019). The Aleppo Minbar: Symmetry and Islamic aesthetics: Art and science. The Journal of the International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry, 70‑73.
· Bolle, K. W. (Ed.). (1987). Secrecy in religions (Vol. 49). Brill Archive.
· Boyd, d. (2026). Social media is now parasocial media. Social media + Society, 12(2).
· Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 30‑44.
· Campbell, H. A. (2007). Who's got the power? Religious authority and the internet. Journal of Computer‑Mediated Communication, 1043‑1062.
· Campbell, H. A. (2012). Understanding the relationship between religious practice online and offline in a networked society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64‑93.
· Chikhaoui, N., & Casewit, F. J. (2004). The minbar: Symbol of verticality and elevation. Sacred Web: A Journal of Tradition and Modernity, 91‑107.
· Civetta, P. (2008). Khutbah/Community: Islam, preaching, and congregational identity. Ecumenica, 23‑37.
· Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 895‑913.
· Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
· Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 119‑161.
· Cummins, S., & Stille, M. (2021). Religious emotions and emotions in religion: The case of sermons. Journal of Religious History, 3‑24.
· Ebrahimi, M., & Yusoff, K. (2018). The impact of cultural diversity on mosques in Malaysia. Asian Culture and History, 45‑57.
· Elder‑Vass, D. (2008). Searching for realism, structure and agency in actor network theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 455‑473.
· Elder‑Vass, D. (2015). Disassembling actor‑network theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 100‑121.
· Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., Hamilton, K., & Sandvig, C. (2015). "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]": Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 153‑162.
· Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer‑Mediated Communication, 35‑52.
· Fathi, A. (1979). The role of the Islamic pulpit. Journal of Communication, pp 102–106.
· Fathi, A. (1981). The Islamic pulpit as a medium of political communication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 163‑172.
· Finlay, L. (2002a). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 209‑230.
· Finlay, L. (2002b). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 531‑545.
· Finnegan, R. (2003). Oral traditions and the verbal arts: A guide to research practices. Routledge.
· Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
· Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of platforms. New Media & Society, 347‑364.
· Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp 167‑194). MIT Press.
· Gillespie, T. (2018). Regulation of and by platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp 254‑278). SAGE Publications.
· Hirschheim, R. (2008). Some guidelines for the critical reviewing of conceptual papers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21.
· Howarth, T. (2005). The Twelver Shi'a as a Muslim minority in India: Pulpit of tears. Routledge.
· Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 441‑456.
· Imamuddin, S. M. (1984). Mosque as a centre of education in the early Middle Ages. Islamic Studies, 159‑170.
· Ingold, T. (2018). Back to the future with the theory of affordances. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 39‑44.
· Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 18‑26.
· Jones, L. G. (2012). The power of oratory in the medieval Muslim world. In M. Cook, N. Haider, I. Rabb, & A. Sayeed (Eds.), Law and tradition in classical Islamic thought (pp 249‑266). Palgrave Macmillan.
· Karimitar, A. (2019). Mourning rituals and their psychological meanings in Iranian culture [Master's thesis, Washington State University].
· Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co‑produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human‑Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1‑44.
· Kühn, M. (2023). The epigraphical program of Mamluk minbars: Religious and Quranic inscriptions emphasizing minbars as a site for preaching. Journal of Material Cultures in the Muslim World, 35‑77.
· Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor‑network‑theory. Oxford University Press.
· Lawrence, B. B. (2008). Review essay: Introducing Islam or reviling Muslims? Contemporary Islam, 85‑89.
· MacInnes, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 136‑154.
· Malmström, H. (2016). Engaging the congregation: The place of meta discourse in contemporary preaching. Applied Linguistics, 561‑582.
· McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw‑Hill.
· Mengual, M. P. (2023). Designing physical interaction platforms. Springer Fachmedien.
· Mostafa, H. (2016). The early mosque revisited: Introduction of the minbar and maqsura. Muqarnas, 1‑16.
· Musahadi. (2016). The role of mosque and khutba in socio‑economic development in Indonesia. Global Journal Al‑Thaqafah, 55‑66.
· Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
· Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J. P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 6‑11.
· Omer, S. (2010). Some lessons from Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in architecture: The Prophet’s Mosque in Madinah. Intellectual Discourse, 115‑140.
· Ong, W. J., & Hartley, J. (2013). Orality and literacy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
· Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. University of Chicago Press.
· Retsö, J. (2020). The framework of Islamic rhetoric: The ritual of the khuṭba and its origin. In S. Stjernholm & E. Özdalga (Eds.), Muslim preaching in the Middle East and beyond: Historical and contemporary case studies (pp. 19‑29). Edinburgh University Press.
· Rock‑Singer, A. (2016). Prayer and the Islamic revival: A timely challenge. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 48(2), 293‑312.
· Sheikhbagloo, O., & Mohamadzadeh, M. (2019). The development flow of wooden minbars in Iran. Persian Cultural Heritage, 57‑65.
· Shirky, C. (2009, November). A speculative post on the idea of algorithmic authority [Blog post]. http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/11/a-speculative-post-on-the-idea-of-algorithmic-authority/
· Sreberny‑Mohammadi, A. (1990). Small media for a big revolution: Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 341‑371.
· van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
· Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
· Ytre‑Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Folk theories of algorithms: Understanding digital irritation. Media, Culture & Society, 807‑824.
· Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
· Zwemer, S. M. (1933). The pulpit in Islam. The Muslim World, 217‑229.
Ebn al-Din Hamidi, M. (2011). A study of the transformations of religious media and their impact on the religious beliefs of the Iranian people. Quarterly Journal of Cultural Protection of the Islamic Revolution, 29–50. [In Persian]
Hosseini, S. (2009). A look at the pulpit as a medium. Qur’anic Sciences and Hadith, 101–105. [In Persian]
Hosseini, S. (2023). The role of the pulpit as the media identity of the seminary in the recent century. Biannual Journal of Religion and Media, 49–65. [In Persian]
Rezvani, A. (2018). The role and position of the pulpit in Afghanistan. Islamic Knowledge, Propagation and Communication, 92–103. [In Persian]
Koolivand, Z. (2013). A medium as old as Islam: The function of the pulpit in the Islamic Revolution. Zamaneh, 53. [In Persian]
Madani Mobarakeh, S. (2010). The presence of the pulpit as a medium on radio and television. Biannual Journal of Religion and Media, 11–39. [In Persian]
Waisbord, S. (2021). Communication: A post-discipline (M. Goodarzi, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Culture, Art and Communications. [In Persian]
Art, Culture and Media